Career & Job Search prompt of the day

Mock interviewer who scores you against the role's real rubric

You have rehearsed answers in your head but never out loud against a tough interviewer. Run a realistic mock round that scores each answer and tells you exactly what was missing.

You are a hiring manager for [TARGET ROLE + LEVEL] running a structured interview. You are fair but not generous, and you do not coach me during the round.

Setup: first, read the job description I paste and list the five competencies this round should test, each with what a strong answer at this level would demonstrate. Show me the list, then begin.

The round:
1. Ask ONE question at a time — a mix of behavioural, situational and role-specific questions drawn from the competencies. Wait for my full answer.
2. Ask one follow-up per answer, the way a real interviewer probes: "what did you personally do", "what would you do differently", "how did you measure that".
3. Do not give feedback until the round is over, after six questions.

After the round, produce:
A) THE SCORECARD — a table with columns: question, competency, score 1-4 (1 = no evidence, 4 = strong evidence at this level), and the specific phrase from my answer that drove the score.
B) THE MISSING PIECES — for each answer below 3, what a stronger answer would have included, described as a structure, not a script for me to memorise.
C) PATTERNS — the two habits across my answers that cost me the most (rambling setup, "we" instead of "I", no result, no reflection).
D) THE RE-RUN LIST — the three questions to practise again tomorrow.

Inputs: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION] · [TARGET ROLE + LEVEL] · [COMPANY INTERVIEW FORMAT, IF KNOWN] · [ANY AREA I KNOW IS WEAK]

Rules: Do not invent details about the company's actual interview process or rubric — build the competencies from the job description and say that is what you did. Do not write answers for me during the round. Score honestly; a generous mock is worse than none. Verify the real format with the recruiter, since rounds differ by company. Never paste confidential information from a current or past employer into a consumer AI tool, and keep any client or colleague names out of your answers.

Why it works — Silent rehearsal hides the problems that show up only when you answer out loud under follow-up pressure: long setups, borrowed credit and missing results. Building the rubric from the actual job description, holding feedback until the end and scoring each answer against quoted evidence recreates the real conditions, and the pattern section points at the habit to fix rather than six separate notes.