PromptSharpDaily briefsLaw › July 13, 2026

PromptSharp Law Brief · free web issue

Law prompt of the day

July 13, 2026 · for Solo & small-firm attorneys, litigation & transactional associates, in-house counsel. One sharp, copy-paste prompt — free, every weekday.

Legal Research & MemosFREE

Research memo skeleton: IRAC draft with a cite-verification table

You need a first-draft research memo on a discrete question tonight. Build the skeleton and the authority map — with a built-in cite-check discipline so no hallucinated case ever reaches a brief.

You are a senior research attorney drafting an INTERNAL first-draft memo for a licensed lawyer's review — this is a drafting aid, not legal advice. I will describe the legal question, jurisdiction, and posture.

Produce:

A) QUESTION PRESENTED — one sentence, jurisdiction-specific.

B) MEMO SKELETON — IRAC structure: issue, governing rule (statute / elements / standard of review), application section built on the fact hooks I gave you, the strongest counterargument, and a conclusion labeled with a confidence level (settled / split / open question).

C) AUTHORITY MAP — a table of every authority you relied on: authority, the proposition it supports, and a VERIFICATION STATUS column preset to "UNVERIFIED — check on Westlaw/Lexis before any use." Do not invent cases, holdings, quotations, or pin cites; if you are not certain an authority exists, write "RESEARCH NEEDED: [describe what to search]" instead of naming one.

D) OPEN QUESTIONS — what the human researcher must confirm: circuit splits, recent amendments, unpublished decisions, local rules.

Inputs: [LEGAL QUESTION] · [JURISDICTION + COURT] · [KEY FACTS — ANONYMIZED] · [CLIENT GOAL / POSTURE]

Rules: Anonymize before you paste — never include client names, privileged communications, or confidential client information in a consumer LLM (ABA Formal Op. 512: informed consent is required before client confidences enter a self-learning tool; use fictional party labels like ACME Corp). Do not invent authority — courts have sanctioned lawyers for AI-fabricated citations. Verify every citation and quotation against Westlaw, Lexis, or the official reporter before it leaves your desk.

What changed for Law

[Odd Lots] Why AI Might Actually Create More Work for Lawyers

It seems obvious that among the many industries that AI might disrupt, the legal profession might face some of the most adverse outcomes. When clerical, research-based tasks like searching through…

podcast

Subscribe free — the PromptSharp Law Brief

Free forever. Today's Law issue is live on the web right now — subscribe and we email you the sample issue immediately, then the Law daily every weekday as its email edition ships. Unsubscribe anytime.

Go Pro: 5 desk-ready prompts every day for Law

Free = the day's prompt. Pro unlocks the full daily prompt set, the searchable archive, and personalization — answer a few questions once and every prompt you copy arrives with your role, company, and tools already filled in. Plus MCP delivery straight into your AI tools.

See pricing → About this vertical

← 2026-07-11 · All Law issues

Better together
Make prompts remember you: Brainfile

Even a sharp prompt starts from zero unless your AI knows you. Brainfile is persistent context — your work, voice, and priorities loaded into every session. Brainfile is the memory; PromptSharp is the playbook. Together they compound — the same prompt gets sharper because it runs on YOUR context.

Set up your brainfile →

Want both? The All-Access + Brainfile annual bundle covers the pair.

PromptSharp prompts are drafted with AI assistance and human-reviewed. They structure how a model reasons over data you provide — they do not source or verify facts for you, and you own every output. Nothing here is financial, legal, tax, or investment advice. Never paste confidential, client, or material non-public information into consumer AI tools; follow your employer's AI-use policy. © 2026 PromptSharp.