PromptSharp › Prompt Library › Consulting & Strategy › Interview synthesis: 12 transcripts into findings your partner will sign
Interview synthesis: 12 transcripts into findings your partner will sign
Two weeks of expert interviews sit in a folder. Get to defensible findings — with quote-level evidence — before the midpoint readout.
The prompt — copy and run it
You are a consulting research lead synthesizing qualitative interviews. I will paste anonymized interview notes or transcripts. Produce: A) FINDINGS TABLE — maximum 6 findings, columns: finding (one sentence, so-what phrasing), supporting evidence (interviewee number + short verbatim quote), count of interviewees supporting it, confidence (strong / emerging / single-source). B) CONTRADICTIONS — where interviews genuinely disagree: both positions, who holds each, and what evidence would resolve it. C) GAPS — the 3 questions still unanswered and which type of interviewee could answer each. Inputs: [PASTE ANONYMIZED NOTES/TRANSCRIPTS, LABELED BY INTERVIEWEE NUMBER + ROLE TYPE] · [THE ENGAGEMENT QUESTION THIS RESEARCH SERVES] Rules: Do not invent, merge, or paraphrase quotes into stronger claims — every finding must trace to at least one pasted line, and single-source findings must carry the single-source label. Verify counts before the readout. Keep all names out — interviewee numbers and role types only.
Why this prompt works
Synthesis fails two ways: cherry-picked quotes or unfalsifiable mush. Source-counting plus confidence labels stops one loud interview from becoming 'the market says', and the contradictions section is where partners actually add value in review.
Want the daily version?
The PromptSharp Consulting Brief delivers prompts like this every day. Honest status: sample stage — 50 waitlist signups start the free daily, and waitlist members see every issue first.
Frequently asked
When should I use this prompt?
Two weeks of expert interviews sit in a folder. Get to defensible findings — with quote-level evidence — before the midpoint readout.
Why does this prompt work?
Synthesis fails two ways: cherry-picked quotes or unfalsifiable mush. Source-counting plus confidence labels stops one loud interview from becoming 'the market says', and the contradictions section is where partners actually add value in review.
What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?
{'code': 'PF05', 'note': "Cherry-picked quotes or unfalsifiable mush — source-counting and confidence labels stop one loud interview from becoming 'the market says'."}
Related Consulting & Strategy prompts
Interview synthesis: turn ten transcripts into three defensible findings
You ran a week of expert interviews and have a pile of notes. Distill them into findings you can defend, with the dissent kept vis…
Pyramid-principle storyline: from findings to a board-ready narrative
The analysis is done; the deck is not. Turn findings into an action-titled storyline the partner can review in 10 minutes.…
All Consulting & Strategy free prompts
The PromptSharp Consulting Brief page — five full free prompts plus the ladder status.
PromptSharp Daily — free
The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. See what each vertical is like before you commit to one.
Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.
Home · Prompt Library · Pricing · Archive · Privacy · Terms · Refunds
Finance · CPG · Marketing · Sales · Consulting & Strategy · Product Management · Dev & Engineering · C-suite · Law · Personal Finance · Career & Job Search · Focus & Productivity · Learning · Health & Fitness · Parenting