PromptSharp › Prompt Library › Dev & Engineering › Test-plan generator: risk-ranked cases from a diff or spec
Test-plan generator: risk-ranked cases from a diff or spec
Feature complete, coverage thin. Generate the test plan ranked by what would actually hurt in production.
The prompt — copy and run it
You are a test engineer designing a risk-based test plan. I will paste the spec or the diff. Produce: A) TEST MATRIX — columns: behavior under test, case type (happy path / boundary / error / concurrency / security / regression), priority (P0 = data loss or crash, P1 = wrong result, P2 = cosmetic), suggested level (unit / integration / e2e), and a one-line sketch of the assertion. B) BOUNDARY ANALYSIS — for each input in the spec: the min, max, empty, null, unicode, and oversized cases that apply. C) NON-DETERMINISM CHECKLIST — time, ordering, retries, clock, locale, randomness: which apply here, and the seam to control each in a test. Inputs: [PASTE SPEC OR DIFF] · [STACK + TEST FRAMEWORK] · [WHAT IS ALREADY COVERED] Rules: Do not invent existing coverage or code behavior — every case must trace to the pasted spec or diff, and assumptions about the implementation must be marked "verify against implementation". No secrets or production data in fixture sketches.
Why this prompt works
Coverage percentages lie; risk-ranked behavior coverage does not. Priority-by-blast-radius keeps the suite lean enough to maintain, and the non-determinism checklist targets the exact flake sources that quietly destroy a team's trust in CI.
Want the daily version?
The PromptSharp Dev Brief delivers prompts like this every day. Honest status: sample stage — 50 waitlist signups start the free daily, and waitlist members see every issue first.
Frequently asked
When should I use this prompt?
Feature complete, coverage thin. Generate the test plan ranked by what would actually hurt in production.
Why does this prompt work?
Coverage percentages lie; risk-ranked behavior coverage does not. Priority-by-blast-radius keeps the suite lean enough to maintain, and the non-determinism checklist targets the exact flake sources that quietly destroy a team's trust in CI.
What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?
{'code': 'PF06', 'note': 'Coverage percentages standing in for safety — risk-ranked behavior coverage by blast radius, plus the non-determinism checklist for flake sources.'}
Related Dev & Engineering prompts
Edge-case hunt: the failure inputs your happy-path tests will miss
Your tests pass but you don't trust them. Enumerate the boundary and failure cases that the happy path never touches.…
Toil audit: find the hours a week your workflow is leaking
You suspect the week disappears into builds, reviews, and context switches. Audit it and get an automation plan with paybacks.…
All Dev & Engineering free prompts
The PromptSharp Dev Brief page — five full free prompts plus the ladder status.
PromptSharp Daily — free
The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. See what each vertical is like before you commit to one.
Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.
Home · Prompt Library · Pricing · Archive · Privacy · Terms · Refunds
Finance · CPG · Marketing · Sales · Consulting & Strategy · Product Management · Dev & Engineering · C-suite · Law · Personal Finance · Career & Job Search · Focus & Productivity · Learning · Health & Fitness · Parenting