PromptSharp › Prompt Library › Learning › Syllabus reverse-engineer: from the job description or exam spec to the minimum curriculum
Syllabus reverse-engineer: from the job description or exam spec to the minimum curriculum
You have the actual document you're being measured against — a job posting or an exam blueprint — and a study plan built for someone else. Work backwards from the document into the shortest curriculum that clears it, with an explicit list of what to skip.
The prompt — copy and run it
You are a curriculum designer working backwards from a document I did not write. I will paste a job description or an exam specification. Turn it into the MINIMUM curriculum that gets me to it — not a thorough one. Produce: A) THE DOCUMENT, PARSED — every capability the document actually requires. For each, QUOTE the phrase in my paste it came from. Requirements that are implied rather than stated go in a separate "implied, not stated" list with what made you infer them. Anything you would add from general knowledge of this role or exam goes in a third list headed "my addition — not in your document." Keeping these three apart is the whole job: the document is the specification, and everything else is a guess about it. B) WHAT I CAN ALREADY DO — map my background onto that list, marking each HAVE / PARTIAL / GAP. Where my background does not settle it, mark it "unclear from what you told me" and say what you would need to know, rather than guessing in either direction. C) THE MINIMUM CURRICULUM — only the GAP and PARTIAL items, in dependency order, with the smallest amount of each that clears the bar this document sets. For each: what "enough" looks like concretely, and the one thing I could produce or answer to prove I am there. If the document states weightings, sections or a scoring breakdown, order the work by ITS numbers and say so. If it does not, say plainly that the ordering is your judgement, and give the reason. D) THE CUT LIST — what a standard study plan or "how to become a ___" guide would include that this document does not require. Name each one and say why it is out. This section is what makes the curriculum minimum instead of complete, so do not leave it thin. E) THE SCHEDULE — the curriculum laid against my weekly hours and my deadline. If the deadline does not fit, say so in the first line and give me the honest options: a narrower target, a later date, or accepting one specific gap — and say which gap is cheapest to accept and what it costs. F) VERIFY BEFORE I COMMIT — that the version I pasted is current (exam blueprints are revised on a cycle and a posting can be months stale), any resource you named, and every item in your "my addition" list. That list is exactly where an invented requirement would hide. Inputs: [PASTE THE FULL JOB DESCRIPTION OR EXAM SPECIFICATION] · [MY BACKGROUND, HONESTLY] · [HOURS PER WEEK] · [DEADLINE OR EXAM DATE] · [WHAT I ALREADY HAVE ACCESS TO] Rules: Do not invent requirements, topic weightings, scoring rules, passing marks or exam-section names that are not in the document I pasted — a fabricated weighting sends me to study the wrong half. Do not invent courses, books or URLs; describe what to look for and tell me to verify it. Do not pad the plan to look thorough — the promise is the minimum that gets me there, and a shorter plan I finish beats a complete one I abandon. Never paste confidential, client, medical, or personally identifying information into a consumer AI tool; if the posting or spec is internal or paid, give me only its requirements sections rather than the whole file.
How to use this prompt
- Copy the full prompt above with the Copy button.
- Fill in your inputs. Replace each bracketed placeholder with your specifics:
[PASTE THE FULL JOB DESCRIPTION OR EXAM SPECIFICATION][MY BACKGROUND, HONESTLY][HOURS PER WEEK][DEADLINE OR EXAM DATE][WHAT I ALREADY HAVE ACCESS TO] - Paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini and run. Read the reality guardrail below before you act on the output.
Why this prompt works
Working backwards from the real document beats any generic roadmap, but only if the document stays separable from the model's opinion about it — otherwise you study a syllabus that was half invented and never know which half. Splitting requirements into stated, implied and my-addition, each stated one quoted from the paste, makes that boundary visible on the page. And the cut list is the part people skip: a minimum curriculum is defined by what it refuses to include, so naming the popular topics this specific document does not require is what turns a reading list into a deadline you can actually hit.
Get a prompt like this every day
The PromptSharp Learning Brief ships one desk-ready prompt every weekday — free on the web today. Free forever. Today's Learning issue is live on the web right now — subscribe and we email you the sample issue immediately, then the Learning daily every weekday as its email edition ships. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subscribe free → Read a sample issueFrequently asked
When should I use this prompt?
You have the actual document you're being measured against — a job posting or an exam blueprint — and a study plan built for someone else. Work backwards from the document into the shortest curriculum that clears it, with an explicit list of what to skip.
Why does this prompt work?
Working backwards from the real document beats any generic roadmap, but only if the document stays separable from the model's opinion about it — otherwise you study a syllabus that was half invented and never know which half. Splitting requirements into stated, implied and my-addition, each stated one quoted from the paste, makes that boundary visible on the page. And the cut list is the part people skip: a minimum curriculum is defined by what it refuses to include, so naming the popular topics this specific document does not require is what turns a reading list into a deadline you can actually hit.
What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?
Models fabricate not only courses and URLs but REQUIREMENTS — topic weightings, section names and passing marks that were never in the document — and an invented weighting sends you to study the wrong half. Stated / implied / my-addition are kept in three separate lists with the stated ones quoted from the paste, and the verify step targets the additions list plus whether the spec version is even current.
Related Learning prompts
Socratic drill: make it test you instead of telling you
You 'know' the material until someone asks you a question. Turn the model into an examiner that finds the gap.…
Explain it to a skeptic and let them find the holes
The final check: teach the concept out loud and get cross-examined by someone who won't nod along.…
Roadmap that ends in a thing you can show, not a course you finished
You want to learn a hard skill and the internet has given you 40 resources and no order. Get a path that terminates in evidence.…
Three-pass reading of a hard text — without outsourcing the thinking
A dense paper or chapter you need to actually understand, not skim. Use the model to scaffold your reading, not replace it.…
Practice project at the edge of your ability — with the answers withheld
You've followed the tutorials. Now get a project that's genuinely hard for you, with a coach that refuses to just hand you the sol…
Build a spaced-recall study plan from your syllabus and exam date
The exam is in 12 days and you don't know where to start. Get a day-by-day plan built on how memory actually works.…
Velocity vs distribution: is this growth real?
Your brand is up and someone wants to plan against it. Before they do, you need to know whether growth is quality (velocity-led) o…
All Learning free prompts
The PromptSharp Learning Brief page — five full free prompts plus today's issue.
PromptSharp Daily — free
The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. Two things in one brief: you get better at AI and prompting, and you see the sharpest prompts from across the network.
Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.
Even a sharp prompt starts from zero unless your AI knows you. Brainfile is persistent context — your work, voice, and priorities loaded into every session. Brainfile is the memory; PromptSharp is the playbook. Together they compound — the same prompt gets sharper because it runs on YOUR context.
Set up your brainfile →Want both? The All-Access + Brainfile annual bundle covers the pair.
Home · Daily Issues · Prompt Library · Glossary · Pricing · For Teams & Universities · Archive · PromptFluent alternative · Newsletter · Privacy · Terms · Refunds
Marketing · Sales · Dev & Engineering · Finance · Product Management · Vibe Coding · C-suite · Consulting & Strategy · Law · CPG · Personal Finance · Career & Job Search · Trading · Health & Fitness · Students · Focus & Productivity · Learning · Travel Planning
Entry Point Trading
Free weekly stocks to watch —
how our model ranks the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100.