PromptSharp › Prompt Library › Students › Evaluate a source's credibility before you cite it
Evaluate a source's credibility before you cite it
You found a source that supports your argument — but is it actually credible, or will it sink your paper's grade?
The prompt — copy and run it
Act as a research-methods TA. I will paste a source (or its abstract + publication details). Help me judge whether to CITE it, and teach me the reasoning so I can do it myself next time. Give me: 1) A credibility scorecard: author expertise, publication/peer-review status, recency, funding/bias signals, and evidence quality — each rated with the specific detail that drove the rating. 2) The 3 questions I should ask of ANY source in this field, and how this one answers them. 3) If I cite it: how to represent its claim accurately (not overstated). If I shouldn't: what kind of source would be stronger. Source: [PASTE ABSTRACT / DETAILS / EXCERPT] My paper's claim it would support: [ONE SENTENCE] Rules: Judge only from what I paste — if author credentials or funding aren't stated, say 'unstated, go check' rather than guessing. Never fabricate a citation, DOI, author, or quote.
Why this prompt works
Students cite weak sources because nobody taught them the screen. Making the model show the detail behind each rating teaches transferable judgment, and the 'never fabricate a citation' rule directly counters the #1 AI-in-research failure (hallucinated references).
Get a prompt like this every day
The PromptSharp Students ships one desk-ready prompt every weekday — free on the web today. Free forever. Today's Students issue is live on the web right now — subscribe and we email you the sample issue immediately, then the Students daily every weekday as its email edition ships. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subscribe free →Frequently asked
When should I use this prompt?
You found a source that supports your argument — but is it actually credible, or will it sink your paper's grade?
Why does this prompt work?
Students cite weak sources because nobody taught them the screen. Making the model show the detail behind each rating teaches transferable judgment, and the 'never fabricate a citation' rule directly counters the #1 AI-in-research failure (hallucinated references).
What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?
{'code': 'AI02', 'note': "Hallucinated / fabricated citations — the prompt bans inventing any reference and forces 'unstated, go verify' over guessing."}
Related Students prompts
Turn a dense reading into a study-ready map (in your own words)
You have a 30-page article due tomorrow and no time to reread it three times. Build understanding, not a summary you'll forget.…
Build a spaced-recall study plan from your syllabus and exam date
The exam is in 12 days and you don't know where to start. Get a day-by-day plan built on how memory actually works.…
All Students free prompts
The PromptSharp Students page — five full free prompts plus today's issue.
PromptSharp Daily — free
The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. Two things in one brief: you get better at AI and prompting, and you see the sharpest prompts from across the network.
Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.
Even a sharp prompt starts from zero unless your AI knows you. Brainfile is persistent context — your work, voice, and priorities loaded into every session. Brainfile is the memory; PromptSharp is the playbook. Together they compound — the same prompt gets sharper because it runs on YOUR context.
Set up your brainfile →Want both? The All-Access + Brainfile annual bundle covers the pair.
Home · Daily Issues · Prompt Library · Pricing · Archive · Privacy · Terms · Refunds
Marketing · Sales · Dev & Engineering · Finance · Product Management · Vibe Coding · C-suite · Consulting & Strategy · Law · CPG · Personal Finance · Career & Job Search · Trading · Health & Fitness · Students · Focus & Productivity · Learning · Travel Planning