PromptSharp › Vibe Coding

PromptSharp Vibe Coding Brief

AI prompts for building software with AI — spec-first asks, the debugging loop, verification before trust, safe refactors, and session management. For builders without an engineering background (our Dev vertical covers professional engineers).

Who it's for: Founders, PMs, designers, analysts — anyone building real software with AI without an engineering background

Join the waitlist — free

Honest status: Sample stage — join the waitlist. When 50 people are on this waitlist, the free daily starts — and waitlist members are the first issue's audience. No spam before launch; one email when the sample is ready, one when the daily begins.

5 full Vibe Coding prompts — free

One per section, straight from the live PromptSharp Vibe Coding Brief pool — full text, copy-paste ready, no signup needed. Every prompt also has its own permanent page.

You are a product-minded software architect helping a non-engineer specify a feature BEFORE any code is written. I will describe what I want in plain language. Produce:

A) SPEC — what the feature does in 5 sentences or fewer: the user, the trigger, the inputs, the outputs, and what 'done and working' means in observable terms I can check myself.

B) EDGE CASES + NON-GOALS — the inputs and situations the feature must handle (empty, wrong format, double-submit, slow network), and an explicit list of what this version will NOT do, so scope stays fixed.

C) DATA + STATE — what needs to be stored or remembered, where it lives, and what happens to existing data if this changes.

D) BUILD REQUEST — the spec rewritten as a single, precise instruction I can paste into my AI coding tool, with the acceptance checks listed at the end.

Inputs: [WHAT I WANT, IN PLAIN LANGUAGE] · [THE APP IT LIVES IN + TECH IF KNOWN] · [WHO USES IT] · [WHAT EXISTS TODAY]

Rules: Do not invent requirements, tech constraints, or existing behavior I didn't state — list every assumption as an open question for me to answer instead. Where 'done' can't be checked without running the app, say exactly what I should click and what I should see so I can verify it myself. Never include API keys, passwords, or customer data in the spec — reference them as named placeholders.

You are a patient senior engineer coaching a non-engineer through debugging their AI-built app. We work the loop strictly in order — REPRODUCE → ISOLATE → FIX → VERIFY — one stage per reply, and you do not move on until I confirm the current stage. Produce, starting at stage 1:

A) REPRODUCE — the exact steps, inputs, and starting state that make the bug happen every time. If I can't make it happen on demand, give me up to 3 things to try to pin it down before anything else.

B) ISOLATE — the smallest change that separates working from broken: what to comment out, which single log line to add, or what input to simplify. One experiment per step, with what each result would mean.

C) FIX — the smallest change that addresses the CAUSE we isolated, not the symptom. State in one sentence why this fix matches the evidence.

D) VERIFY — rerun the reproduction from A, plus the 2 nearby behaviors most likely to have broken from the fix.

Inputs: [WHAT I EXPECTED vs WHAT HAPPENED] · [PASTE THE ERROR OR SCREENSHOT TEXT] · [WHAT CHANGED RIGHT BEFORE IT BROKE] · [STACK / TOOL IF KNOWN]

Rules: Do not invent code, settings, or causes you cannot see in what I pasted — when you need something, ask for the specific file or output instead of guessing. No rewrites of whole files while we're isolating; smallest possible steps only. Never ask me to paste API keys, passwords, or customer data — I'll replace secrets with placeholders. The bug isn't fixed until stage D passes and I verify it myself.

You are a QA engineer writing a hands-on verification checklist for someone who cannot read the code they're about to ship. I will describe the feature and paste what the AI claims it did. Produce:

A) CLAIM LIST — every specific claim in the AI's summary ('saves to the database', 'sends the email', 'handles invalid input'), each restated as a checkable statement.

B) CHECKLIST — for each claim: the exact clicks and inputs to try, what I should SEE if it works, and what failure would look like — covering the happy path, the empty or wrong input, doing it twice fast, and the refresh-the-page case.

C) EVIDENCE CHECK — for claims I can't see in the interface (data saved, email sent, background job ran), the concrete place to look for proof: which screen, dashboard, table, or inbox.

D) VERDICT RULE — the checklist scored: which items are must-pass before anyone else uses this, and which can wait.

Inputs: [WHAT THE FEATURE SHOULD DO] · [PASTE THE AI'S 'DONE' SUMMARY] · [WHERE IT RUNS: LOCAL / LIVE URL] · [WHAT REAL USERS WILL DO WITH IT]

Rules: Do not invent behavior, and never assume a claim is true because the AI asserted it — every claim gets a check I can physically perform, and anything unverifiable gets flagged 'needs a way to verify' as its own to-do. Use test data only; never run checks with real customer records, and never paste real customer data into an AI tool.

You are a senior engineer running a strictly behavior-preserving refactor for someone who builds with AI. The feature WORKS; our only goal is to make it safer to change next time. I will paste the working code. Produce:

A) FREEZE LIST — the exact current behaviors we must not change, written as checks I can run before and after (inputs → expected visible results). This is the contract; nothing proceeds until it's written.

B) CLEANUP PLAN — the 3-5 highest-value improvements ONLY (duplicated logic, misleading names, dead code, one giant function split up), each with: what it fixes, why it's safe, and which freeze-list checks cover it. Explicitly list what we are NOT touching this pass.

C) ONE CHANGE AT A TIME — the first cleanup as a single small change, then STOP so I can rerun the freeze checks before you continue to the next.

D) DONE REPORT — after the pass: what changed, what deliberately didn't, and the freeze-list rerun results.

Inputs: [PASTE THE WORKING CODE] · [WHAT IT DOES TODAY] · [WHAT I EXPECT TO CHANGE OR ADD NEXT MONTH] · [ANY KNOWN FRAGILE SPOTS]

Rules: Do not invent tests, behaviors, or requirements beyond the pasted code and my description — the freeze list comes first and everything must trace to it. No new features, no dependency swaps, no 'while we're here' rewrites. If a cleanup can't be verified with the freeze checks, skip it and say so. I verify each step by running the checks myself before you continue. Keep proprietary code out of consumer AI tools beyond what I pasted.

You are a technical writer building a PROJECT CONTEXT BRIEF — the document I paste at the start of every AI coding session so the model starts oriented instead of guessing. I will paste what I have (notes, file list, previous chat summary). Produce:

A) THE BRIEF (one page max) — sections: what the app is and who uses it (2 sentences); current tech and structure (bullet list of the main files or pieces and what each does); decisions already made and why (so they don't get re-litigated); current state (what works, what's broken, what's half-built); conventions to follow (naming, patterns, style I've committed to).

B) DO-NOT LIST — the things previous sessions got wrong that the next session must not repeat, stated as direct instructions.

C) SESSION HANDOFF TEMPLATE — a 5-line form I fill at the END of each session (what changed, what broke, what's next, what I learned, files touched) that becomes the update to this brief.

D) STALENESS CHECK — the 3 parts of this brief most likely to go out of date, and what to reverify each week.

Inputs: [WHAT THE APP IS] · [PASTE FILE LIST OR STRUCTURE] · [KEY DECISIONS MADE SO FAR] · [WHAT PAST SESSIONS KEPT GETTING WRONG]

Rules: Do not invent project details, decisions, or file purposes I didn't give you — anything you're inferring must be marked 'confirm' so I verify it against the actual project before it enters the brief. The brief describes what IS, not what should be. Never include API keys, passwords, or customer data in the brief — name them as placeholders and note where they live.

Free Vibe Coding prompt guides

Copy-paste prompts you can run right now — free, model-agnostic:

The ladder this vertical climbs

What Pro will include here

The universal Pro benefit set — identical architecture in every PromptSharp vertical:

MCP access is live today — connect the prompt library in Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor in two minutes →

Pricing →