PromptSharp › Prompt Library › C-suite › Competitive scan brief: signal-ranked moves and the response option set
Competitive scan brief: signal-ranked moves and the response option set
Quarterly strategy review. Turn scattered competitor news into a ranked read on what actually threatens you — with response options costed.
The prompt — copy and run it
You are a competitive-intelligence analyst preparing an executive brief. I will paste the raw signals I have collected. Produce: A) SIGNAL TABLE — for each competitor move: source + date, what happened (fact only), likely intent (explicitly labeled inference), threat to us (direct / adjacent / none) with the reasoning, and urgency (act this quarter / monitor / ignore). B) PATTERN READ — 3 sentences maximum on the direction the market is moving, derived from these signals alone. C) RESPONSE OPTIONS — for the top 2 threats: the do-nothing cost, a cheap countermove, and a full response, each with effort and risk. D) WATCHLIST — 5 indicators to check next quarter and where to find each. Inputs: [PASTE COMPETITOR NEWS / FILINGS / JOB POSTINGS / PRICING CHANGES] · [OUR POSITION + CURRENT PRIORITIES] Rules: Do not invent competitor moves or numbers — every table row must cite a pasted source, and intent must always be labeled as inference. Verify market-size or share claims externally before repeating them in any deck. Use only public information — nothing from private or confidential channels.
Why this prompt works
Executive teams drown in competitor noise. Source-per-row and intent-as-labeled-inference prevent narrative laundering — the analyst failure mode where speculation compounds into 'known fact' — and the do-nothing cost line makes 'monitor' an actual decision instead of a shrug.
Want the daily version?
The PromptSharp C-suite Brief delivers prompts like this every day. Honest status: sample stage — 50 waitlist signups start the free daily, and waitlist members see every issue first.
Frequently asked
When should I use this prompt?
Quarterly strategy review. Turn scattered competitor news into a ranked read on what actually threatens you — with response options costed.
Why does this prompt work?
Executive teams drown in competitor noise. Source-per-row and intent-as-labeled-inference prevent narrative laundering — the analyst failure mode where speculation compounds into 'known fact' — and the do-nothing cost line makes 'monitor' an actual decision instead of a shrug.
What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?
{'code': 'PF05', 'note': "Narrative laundering: competitor speculation compounding into 'known fact' — source-per-row and intent-as-labeled-inference, with a do-nothing cost line."}
Related C-suite prompts
Competitive teardown: what a rival's moves reveal about their strategy
A competitor made a move and the team is reacting emotionally. Get a cold read on what it signals and whether it changes your plan…
Decision stress-test: pre-mortem, base rates, and pre-committed tripwires
A big call is hardening into consensus. Stress-test it with the advisor who is paid to disagree — before the money moves.…
All C-suite free prompts
The PromptSharp C-suite Brief page — five full free prompts plus the ladder status.
PromptSharp Daily — free
The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. See what each vertical is like before you commit to one.
Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.
Home · Prompt Library · Pricing · Archive · Privacy · Terms · Refunds
Finance · CPG · Marketing · Sales · Consulting & Strategy · Product Management · Dev & Engineering · C-suite · Law · Personal Finance · Career & Job Search · Focus & Productivity · Learning · Health & Fitness · Parenting