PromptSharpPrompt LibraryFinance › Model integrity / error & formula-audit review

Financial Analysis & ModelingFREE

Model integrity / error & formula-audit review

Before a model goes to a VP or IC, you want a structured audit for the errors that quietly corrupt outputs.

The prompt — copy and run it

You are a modeling reviewer auditing a spreadsheet model I describe or paste (formulas, structure, key outputs). Produce a MODEL-INTEGRITY review covering:
1. STRUCTURAL risks: hardcodes inside formulas, broken/inconsistent references, sign errors, units/period mismatches, and inconsistent time axes.
2. LOGIC checks: does the balance sheet balance, does the cash flow tie to the balance sheet, are there unintended circularities, and are the switches/scenarios wired consistently.
3. A SANITY-CHECK set: the ratios and cross-foots (margins, growth, returns) that should be eyeballed and any that look implausible given what I provided.
4. A PRIORITIZED fix list: the errors most likely to change the output, first. Do not assume a value I did not give you — flag it as unverified.

Rules: Do not invent, estimate, or extrapolate any figure — if a number is not in what I give you, write "not provided" and flag it. Mark every claim I should verify externally before relying on it. Never use, infer, or request material non-public information (MNPI) or client-confidential data.

Why this prompt works

Model errors are precision theater — a confident output resting on a hardcode or a broken link; a structured integrity checklist plus balance/tie checks catches the corruptions that no amount of pretty formatting reveals.

Get a prompt like this every day

The PromptSharp Finance is live today — one desk-ready prompt per section, every weekday. Free tier: one rotating section's full prompt per day.

Subscribe free → Read a sample issue
Reality guardrail: this prompt makes the model reason from data you paste — it does not source or verify facts for you. Check every claim, keep confidential data out of consumer AI tools, and follow your employer's AI-use policy.

Frequently asked

When should I use this prompt?

Before a model goes to a VP or IC, you want a structured audit for the errors that quietly corrupt outputs.

Why does this prompt work?

Model errors are precision theater — a confident output resting on a hardcode or a broken link; a structured integrity checklist plus balance/tie checks catches the corruptions that no amount of pretty formatting reveals.

What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?

PF06

Related Finance prompts

Financial Analysis & Modeling

Adjusted-EBITDA add-back bridge scrutiny

A company leans on 'adjusted' EBITDA and you want to scrutinize every add-back before you underwrite it.…

Financial Analysis & Modeling

Three-statement driver interrogation + model sanity-check

You have a working model (or a target's historicals) and want a fast, structured challenge of the assumptions before it goes to a …

Financial Analysis & Modeling

DCF assumption interrogation + sensitivity map

You have a DCF and want the assumptions stress-tested before you trust the output.…

Pitch & Presentation

IC / investment memo first draft from a raw thesis

You have the thesis and the numbers in your head (or a messy notes doc) and need a structured first-draft memo you can edit, not a…

All Finance free prompts

The PromptSharp Finance page — five full free prompts plus the ladder status.

PromptSharp Daily — free

The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. See what each vertical is like before you commit to one.

Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.

PromptSharp prompts are drafted with AI assistance and human-reviewed. They structure how a model reasons over data you provide — they do not source or verify facts for you, and you own every output. Nothing here is financial, legal, tax, or investment advice. Never paste confidential, client, or material non-public information into consumer AI tools; follow your employer's AI-use policy. © 2026 PromptSharp.